[PlanetCCRMA] PlanetCCRMA *not* in the press
Nicholas Manojlovic
nicholasmanojlovic@gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 17:51:01 2007
------=_Part_125026_30931852.1186534235353
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
When F7 came out, they annoced respins.org - a place to share your own spins
of Fedora.
Fernando, where does the distro stand in terms of using
trade-marks/copyright material from stanford? In theory, is it legal to
distribute our own ccrma on such a website as a stand-alone?
On 8/8/07, Edward Lilley <ejlilley@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jeff Sandys wrote:
> > My two cents: European magazine, European distributions.
> >
> > When I started the choice was PlanetCCRMA or Agnula.
> > Now Agnula is dead, long live PlanetCCRMA.
> >
> > I installed UbuntuStudio on my wife's computer after the
> > experience I had building an Ubuntu computer for my inlaws.
> > Now my wife can help her parents with their computer, and
> > she might do some scoring for her string quartet.
> >
> > And I like the Pure:Dyne live CD (Dynabolic). One of their
> > packages is Fluxus, a mashup of PLT Scheme with OpenGL,
> > ODE free body dynamics and OSC sound. I need to recompile
> > PLT Scheme with some different options to get Fluxus to work
> > in Fedora/PlanetCCRMA. I have Pure:Dyne docked/nested
> > on my laptop.
> >
> > I think the improvements in the Fedora build process will help
> > make PlanetCCRMA a stronger contender in the future, with
> > the ability to make a live CD/DVD and directly install with ease.
> >
> > -- Jeff Sandys
> >
> >
> > Stephan Neuhaus-2 wrote:
> >
> >> ...
> >> Spiegel Online, one of Germany's most-read online magazines,
> >> ...
> >> "Linux users have the choice between at least five current
> >> distributions geared specially processing audio:
> >> 64 Studio, Dynabolic, Jacklab, Musix, and Ubuntu Studio."
> >> ...
> >> There is no mention of PlanetCCRMA in the article.
> >> ...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> I think a live-CD would be a really good idea for PlanetCCRMA (or even
> just a stand-alone distro). Perhaps the magazine's criteria for
> "distribution" meant stand-alone. However, even though planetCCRMA
> arguably is no less a distro in its own right than UbuntuStudio (which,
> seeing as it uses _only_ Ubuntu packages is probably less of a distro
> than planetCCRMA), I think a stand-alone liveCD/installation DVD would
> be a great way forwards (or sideways).
>
> Also, replying to the comment about "academic" music packages, I assume
> by academic you mean slightly older midi sequencers with more
> sophisticated programming tools, not WYSIWYG classical music notation
> applications (which is what I prefer) :-) .
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
------=_Part_125026_30931852.1186534235353
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
When F7 came out, they annoced <a href="http://respins.org">respins.org</a> - a place to share your own spins of Fedora. <br><br>Fernando, where does the distro stand in terms of using trade-marks/copyright material from stanford? In theory, is it legal to distribute our own ccrma on such a website as a stand-alone?
<br><br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Edward Lilley</b> <<a href="mailto:ejlilley@gmail.com">ejlilley@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Jeff Sandys wrote:<br>> My two cents: European magazine, European distributions.<br>><br>> When I started the choice was PlanetCCRMA or Agnula.<br>> Now Agnula is dead, long live PlanetCCRMA.<br>><br>> I installed UbuntuStudio on my wife's computer after the
<br>> experience I had building an Ubuntu computer for my inlaws.<br>> Now my wife can help her parents with their computer, and<br>> she might do some scoring for her string quartet.<br>><br>> And I like the Pure:Dyne live CD (Dynabolic). One of their
<br>> packages is Fluxus, a mashup of PLT Scheme with OpenGL,<br>> ODE free body dynamics and OSC sound. I need to recompile<br>> PLT Scheme with some different options to get Fluxus to work<br>> in Fedora/PlanetCCRMA. I have Pure:Dyne docked/nested
<br>> on my laptop.<br>><br>> I think the improvements in the Fedora build process will help<br>> make PlanetCCRMA a stronger contender in the future, with<br>> the ability to make a live CD/DVD and directly install with ease.
<br>><br>> -- Jeff Sandys<br>><br>><br>> Stephan Neuhaus-2 wrote:<br>><br>>> ...<br>>> Spiegel Online, one of Germany's most-read online magazines,<br>>> ...<br>>> "Linux users have the choice between at least five current
<br>>> distributions geared specially processing audio:<br>>> 64 Studio, Dynabolic, Jacklab, Musix, and Ubuntu Studio."<br>>> ...<br>>> There is no mention of PlanetCCRMA in the article.<br>>> ...
<br>>><br>>><br>><br>><br>I think a live-CD would be a really good idea for PlanetCCRMA (or even<br>just a stand-alone distro). Perhaps the magazine's criteria for<br>"distribution" meant stand-alone. However, even though planetCCRMA
<br>arguably is no less a distro in its own right than UbuntuStudio (which,<br>seeing as it uses _only_ Ubuntu packages is probably less of a distro<br>than planetCCRMA), I think a stand-alone liveCD/installation DVD would
<br>be a great way forwards (or sideways).<br><br>Also, replying to the comment about "academic" music packages, I assume<br>by academic you mean slightly older midi sequencers with more<br>sophisticated programming tools, not WYSIWYG classical music notation
<br>applications (which is what I prefer) :-) .<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>PlanetCCRMA mailing list<br><a href="mailto:PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu">PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu</a>
<br><a href="http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma">http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma</a><br></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_125026_30931852.1186534235353--