[PlanetCCRMA] apt repo for fedora extras & extras development?

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 20:50 +0000, Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Monday 31 October 2005 04:02, Michael Gurevich wrote:
> > I've been looking for this too. I did some research and found that
> > rpm.livna.org seems to have up-to-date Fedora Extras:
> > http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/3/i386/RPMS.extras/
> >
> > but there doesn't seem to be a pkglist.extras, so apt can't find it. I
> > wonder if this is by design?
> >
> > Michael.
> 
> Hi Michael. Sorry not to have come back sooner. I've been trying to get some 
> audio apps running with wine. As nobody else has come back with any 
> suggestions, I presume that there isn't an apt repository for Fedora-extras. 

Hmmm, there is one for fc4 at Planet CCRMA, just add a url with "extras"
at the end instead of "core", "updates", etc, etc. 

__BUT__: it is a snapshot for fc4 I have not updated in a long long time
so it is _not_ current. Before I update I have to test to see if
anything there breaks Planet CCRMA packages (at least in obvious ways). 

-- Fernando

> I'll just have to go with Yum for those. It's only for deps for two apps. 
> Smack. A drum machine, which needs om, and omins as deps. Unfortunately om 
> has a load of deps. Gtkmm, glibmm,libsigc++-2.0, and the list goes on. The 
> other app is Sineshaper. A synth, which also needs gtkmm, and the rest. I'm 
> not too good working with tarballs, and thought an apt repo would speed 
> things up a bit. Many thanks anyway, for replying. All the best. Nigel.
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Nigel Henry wrote:
> > > Hi. Is there an apt repository for Fedora extras, and Fedora extras
> > > development? They say to use yum, but I'd prefer to use apt-get, as it
> > > has synaptic, and is usefull for tracking down available packages. Nigel.