[PlanetCCRMA] 64 bit Fedora Core 3?

Brad Fuller brad@sonaural.com
Sat Apr 23 17:12:01 2005


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060605020203030602080300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mark Knecht wrote:

>On 4/23/05, pirrone <pirrone@localnet.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I've got a system scheduled to arrive soon on which I expect to try
>>Fedora Core 3 64-bit.   What support is there on the Planet for this OS
>>choice?  It's not clear looking at the site, or at least I couldn't find
>>anything on this.
>>
>>Also, I assume when Fedora Core 4 is out that it would not at least
>>initially be possible to use this OS with the CCRMA software.  Is that
>>correct?  If so, when might this version of Fedora be supported?
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>Frank
>>
>>--
>>humans may reply by deleting the x from my address
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
>>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Frank,
>   I'm curious - is it an issue of support or is it an issue of
>optimization? I thought the FC3 kernel (and all others that I know of)
>run fine on AMD_64 processors but they just don't take advantage of
>the 64-bit nature of the processor.
>  
>
I put together a mythtv box with FC2-64bit (AMD) and it was tough to get 
all of the apps in 64bit (this was 6 months ago). I had to build most of 
them myself and I ended up with a fractured KDE environment on top of it 
all.
I could have gone the route of FC2-32bit and not worry about it -- but I 
didn't know there was so little support for 64-bit apps at the time. 
Most posts to this ml have suggested to stick with 32bit for now.

So, I'm curious to hear the responses of Frank's message.

brad

--------------060605020203030602080300
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Mark Knecht wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid5bdc1c8b0504231625356993b6@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">On 4/23/05, pirrone <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pirrone@localnet.com">&lt;pirrone@localnet.com&gt;</a> wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">I've got a system scheduled to arrive soon on which I expect to try
Fedora Core 3 64-bit.   What support is there on the Planet for this OS
choice?  It's not clear looking at the site, or at least I couldn't find
anything on this.

Also, I assume when Fedora Core 4 is out that it would not at least
initially be possible to use this OS with the CCRMA software.  Is that
correct?  If so, when might this version of Fedora be supported?

Thanks!

Frank

--
humans may reply by deleting the x from my address

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu">PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma">http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma</a>

    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
Frank,
   I'm curious - is it an issue of support or is it an issue of
optimization? I thought the FC3 kernel (and all others that I know of)
run fine on AMD_64 processors but they just don't take advantage of
the 64-bit nature of the processor.
  </pre>
</blockquote>
I put together a mythtv box with FC2-64bit (AMD) and it was tough to
get all of the apps in 64bit (this was 6 months ago). I had to build
most of them myself and I ended up with a fractured KDE environment on
top of it all.<br>
I could have gone the route of FC2-32bit and not worry about it -- but
I didn't know there was so little support for 64-bit apps at the time.
Most posts to this ml have suggested to stick with 32bit for now.<br>
<br>
So, I'm curious to hear the responses of Frank's message.<br>
<br>
brad<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------060605020203030602080300--