[PlanetCCRMA] 2.4.20-31.1.caps.rh90.ccrmasmp kernel not installing
Noah Garrett Wallach
logic at enabled.com
Thu Nov 11 10:52:01 PST 2004
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:05:22 -0500, Joe Hartley wrote
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 06:17:01 -0800
> "Noah Garrett Wallach" <logic at enabled.com> wrote:
>
> > On 10 Nov 2004 20:12:16 -0800, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote
> > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 16:37, Noah Garrett Wallach wrote:
> > > > okay I am building another ccrma machine and arriving at a strange issue.
> > >
> > > Enterprise Linux again? Sigh. Unsupported!!
> >
> > I understand ya here but Redhat 9.0 was end of life on April 30, 2004 - thats
> > over 6 months ago - which is eons in the computer world. Redhat no longer
> > supports it or updates to it.
>
> That doesn't mean it's still not the best solution to a problem!
>
> > So I am stuck here with new hardware that redhat 9.0 doesnt boot on since it
> > cant probe it and does nto have the drivers for most of it. and I dont think
> > FC1 would boot on it either, although I have not tried.
>
> Noah, I'm running RH9 on a brand-spanking-new P4 and ASUS mobo. I'm
> a bit confused as to why you say you can't run RH9 on your system.
> Where is the probe failing?
Thanks Joe,
its failing because both my machines use a serial ATA bus which requires an
ata_piix driver which is absent with RH9 but ships with the latest update to
Linux Enterprise.
Here is information on my machine:
http://www.centralcomputer.com/itemdetail.asp?item=SYSSHUSB811R
Also I am finding that it is not installed with the recent RH9 CCRMA kernels
versions 2.4.20-31.1 and 2.4.26-1.ll - so I am unable to boot without it. The
drive in the machine does not get recognized at all.
I am going to try FC2 to see if that fixes things - since these machines are
dedicated to the CCRMA project.
--- snip ---
[root at dhcp-183-1-168-192 root]# find /lib/modules/ -name ata_piix\*
/lib/modules/2.4.21-20.EL/kernel/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.o
/lib/modules/2.4.21-20.ELsmp/kernel/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.o
--- snip ---
- Noah
>
> Right now, the distro of choice for Planet CCRMA seems to be FC1. I
> am still running RH9 though, since there's little incentive to upgrade.
> RedHat's support is pretty much irrelevant to me, since Planet CCRMA
> keeps all of the tools I care about up to date. Is there a
> compelling reason for you to use a RH supported distro?
>
> --
> ======================================================================
> Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh at brainiac.com
> Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list