[Fwd: Re: [Gdam-devel] [Fwd: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Problem with GDAM]]
Josh Steiner
josh@vitriolix.com
Wed Aug 13 21:43:01 2003
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080303010906070501080209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--
____________________________________________________
independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
--------------080303010906070501080209
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
name="Re: [Gdam-devel] [Fwd: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Problem with GDAM]"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="Re: [Gdam-devel] [Fwd: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Problem with GDAM]"
Return-Path: <geoff@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Delivered-To: joschi-josh@vitriolix.com
Received: (qmail 5837 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 02:23:29 -0000
Received: from lek.ugcs.caltech.edu (131.215.43.201)
by dsl092-251-241.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 02:23:29 -0000
Received: by lek.ugcs.caltech.edu (Postfix, from userid 3669)
id 4A433D6803; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 19:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 19:23:13 -0700
From: Lance Blisters <geoff@lek.ugcs.caltech.edu>
To: Josh Steiner <josh@vitriolix.com>
Subject: Re: [Gdam-devel] [Fwd: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Problem with GDAM]
Message-ID: <20030814022313.GA3515@lek.ugcs.caltech.edu>
References: <3F3A9F29.60800@vitriolix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F3A9F29.60800@vitriolix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: geoff@ugcs.caltech.edu
gdam should build cleanly from cvs if you have
all the supporting libraries... sometimes i comment out
the doc/ subdirectory as it is most demanding.
i would like to build a release myself, but i don't have
net access for my linux box at the moment.
-geoff
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 01:27:21PM -0700, Josh Steiner wrote:
> hey guys, there is some talk on the planetccrma list about the state of
> GDAM and redhat 8/9. planetccrma is a media meta distribution on top of
> redhat if you didnt know. basically, i wonder if you could comment on
> these issues, i'd happily relay it to the ccrma maintainer.
>
> -josh
>
> ----
>
> >>Yeah, GDAM hasn't been actively worked on in a few years it looks like.
>
> >>>>I think I'll move it to a "deprecated" category. I don't know if gdam is
> >>>>still being developed in cvs, I'll take a look.
> >
> >
> >
> >GDAM is still being worked on, i'm on the CVS updates list for it and
> >its definitely alive.
>
>
> Do you know if a release is in the works? I'm not on the list so I have
> no idea on whether packaging cvs would be a good idea (is it "stable" or
> in a state of flux?). The current Planet CCRMA packages don't really
> work so I should either update or remove...
>
> -- Fernando
>
>
> ----
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________
> independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
>
>
>
> Delivered-To: joschi-josh@vitriolix.com
> Subject: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Problem with GDAM
> From: Jonathan Phillips <jon@protofunk.org>
> To: planetccrma <planetccrma@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> In-Reply-To: <3F3A98BD.5040902@vitriolix.com>
> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4
> X-Spamscanner: mailbox1.ucsd.edu (v1.2 May 26 2003 01:55:38, -4.9/5.0 2.55)
> X-Spam-Level: Level
> X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.7 6712 h7DKIAK6013180 mailbox1.ucsd.edu)
> Errors-To: planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> X-BeenThere: planetccrma@ccrma.stanford.edu
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Help: <mailto:planetccrma-request@ccrma.stanford.edu?subject=help>
> List-Post: <mailto:planetccrma@ccrma.stanford.edu>
> List-Subscribe: <http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma>,
> <mailto:planetccrma-request@ccrma.stanford.edu?subject=subscribe>
> List-Id: Planet CCRMA Package Collection <planetccrma.ccrma.stanford.edu>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma>,
> <mailto:planetccrma-request@ccrma.stanford.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/>
> X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:18:09 -0700
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:18:09 -0700
>
> Still though, the current public releases are significantly deprecated
> for real use, unless you are running a redhat7.3 system with patches.
>
> It would be great if there were some maintenance releases released, cuz
> when gdam crashes, it takes out the whole system in hard lock.
>
> jon
>
> On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 12:59, Josh Steiner wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 11:20, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>>Yeah, GDAM hasn't been actively worked on in a few years it looks like.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>I think I'll move it to a "deprecated" category. I don't know if gdam is
> > >>still being developed in cvs, I'll take a look.
> > >>
> >
> > GDAM is still being worked on, i'm on the CVS updates list for it and
> > its definitely alive.
> >
> > -josh
> --
> Jonathan Phillips <jon@protofunk.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
--------------080303010906070501080209--