[CM] music5
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
znmeb at cesmail.net
Sat May 3 16:47:39 PDT 2008
Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
> I got Max's book, and it answers my questions: there were no
> real differences between music 4 and 5 (the latter tried to avoid
> machine code, instruments and note lists could occur in the
> same file, and the input syntax was lightened up a bit).
> Also, Max himself did the 36-bit stuff -- that was not for
> the PDP-10, but for the GE645 -- I didn't even know General
> Electric made a computer. And I now have copiously
> annotated input, so I have no excuse.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cmdist mailing list
> Cmdist at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
>
I was under the impression that Max himself did the 36-bit stuff because
his original version was on the IBM 704, a 36-bit machine. I thought
that his original version had been on the IBM 7090 until I did some
Google searches the other day. The 7090 was upward compatible from the
704, however.
Yes, General Electric, Philco, RCA, Bendix, Honeywell and Xerox all made
computers at one time. Gradually they all got absorbed. I forget who
bought RCA's computer division, but Honeywell ended up with both Xerox
and General Electric in addition to their own. In fact, "Unix" was a
play on the name "Multics", a GE/Honeywell operating system.
More information about the Cmdist
mailing list