[CM] Newbie learning. . . . CM / CLM-3 / SND / Scheme???
Joseph Anderson
J.Anderson at hull.ac.uk
Fri May 25 07:09:31 PDT 2007
Hello Bill,
Oops, not intending to be so selective in my quoting. . . the below quote just jumped out at me.
So would you suggest the Snd route as the modern way forward? Just a quick glance at the Snd pages, the option of using Ruby looks somewhat more approachable for the lisp clueless.
I suppose if I have a go with the docs I can work out how to use Snd as a batchable Music V engine?
So you're suggesting this path rather than the clm-3?
Thanks,
Jo
-----Original Message-----
From: cmdist-admin at ccrma.Stanford.EDU on behalf of Bill Schottstaedt
Sent: Fri 05/25/2007 1:18 PM
To: Joseph Anderson; Cmdist at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Cc:
Subject: Re: [CM] Newbie learning. . . . CM / CLM-3 / SND / Scheme???
> interpreted Scheme (as in Snd currently) is about 30 to 100 times
> slower than CLM instruments using the run macro.
Geez, it's the week for selective quoting -- the very next sentence explains
that the run macro exists now in Snd, and the difference in compute time
is more like a factor of 4 -- even that strikes me as high -- I'll have to
re-run some of my timing tests to see how close it is. I'll rewrite that
paragraph. I think Snd is easier to use than the CL versions of clm.
I don't have an extended tutorial for clm -- one is badly needed.
There are lots of example instruments and note lists, and sndscm.html
has individual discussions of each of the clm instruments in Snd (clm-ins
for example).
_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
Cmdist at ccrma.stanford.edu
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/cmdist/attachments/20070525/a455d7c2/attachment.ksh>
More information about the Cmdist
mailing list