[Stk] STK and Pure data

[Gary Scavone]

add #include <limits.h>

--gary

On 2010-02-04, at 12:21 PM, Pierre Massat wrote:

> Hi,
> here's the error i get in RtAudio (trying to compile 4.2.0):
> 
> RtAudio.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool RtApiAlsa::probeDeviceOpen(int, RtApi::StreamMode, int, int, RtAudioFormat, int*, int)’:
> RtAudio.cpp:3990: error: ‘INT_MAX’ was not declared in this scope
> 
> I don't know which header i should add to make it work...
> 
> I have Fedora 12, with the CCRMA rt kernel installed. As for gcc, i m assuming i have the latest version since i downloaded it only two days ago from the CCRMA repository. 
> 
> Pierre
> 
> 2010/2/3 Stephen Sinclair <sinclair at music.mcgill.ca>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Pierre Massat <pimassat at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > thank you all for your replies. I still can't compile anything till the
> > end... the thing is that i don't need the latest version, i need version
> > 4.2.0 because some Pure Data externals based on ragamatic require it (and
> > they won't compile with the newest STK). Since i plan on using it with flext
> > to create my own Pd externals, i need an old version anyway.
> > So 4.2.0 won't compile, even with all the #include lines added. Same with
> > 4.2.1. Is there something i m missing here? I know that STK is supposed to
> > always be an alpha release, but why is it so hard to compile?
> > I m not posting the errors this time as there were too many (i stopped at
> > RtAudio which caused an error that i couldn't fix).
> > Thanks again for your help!
> 
> Well, it is hard to help if you don't post the errors, but again I
> advise you to just look for which headers are needed for the functions
> that are referenced and add them to the cpp files.  (If that is the
> only problem..)
> 
> Otherwise, by all means post your results so we can help.  Also, what
> OS and gcc version are you using?  I notice that in my Ubuntu 9.04
> installation, dpkg reports that the package for stk is at version
> 4.2.0, so maybe you could get some mileage out of using that
> pre-compiled version?
> 
> Of course, it's not really expected that an old version maintained to
> compile in a newer system, but I'm sure it can be patched to work with
> a bit of effort.  However I think it would be instead worth your while
> to get those Pd externals working with the latest version of STK.  For
> one thing, it includes some improvements for inlining of the tick()
> functions, so it would make things a bit more optimized.
> 
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stk mailing list
> Stk at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk