[PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo

Yury Bulka setthemfree at privacyrequired.com
Wed Oct 25 08:23:15 PDT 2017


I have been using SC on debian for quite a while (with, I guess, system-wide boost lib), and didn't notice any problems.

On October 25, 2017 6:00:49 PM EEST, ycollette.nospam at free.fr wrote:
>I activated SYSTEM_BOOST=ON in cmake and everything compiled fine too
>...
>
>----- Mail original -----
>De: "ycollette nospam" <ycollette.nospam at free.fr>
>À: "Bernardo Barros" <bernardobarros at gmail.com>
>Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Octobre 2017 16:54:30
>Objet: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo
>
>Here, I put a spec file for SuperCollider. It builds fine on my
>machine.
>The build is now queued on copr to see if everything is fine on a
>fedora build server:
>
>https://github.com/ycollet/fedora-spec
>
>----- Mail original -----
>De: "Bernardo Barros" <bernardobarros at gmail.com>
>À: "Yury Bulka" <setthemfree at privacyrequired.com>,
>planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Octobre 2017 16:29:29
>Objet: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo
>
>On 10/25/17 10:22, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> On 10/25/17 05:18, Yury Bulka wrote:
>>> There seems to be an option in SC to build against system boost
>library:
>>>
>https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/blob/develop/CMakeLists.txt#L234
>
>>>
>>>
>>> And debian seems to be using it:
>>>
>https://sources.debian.net/src/supercollider/1:3.7.0%7Erepack-4/debian/rules/#L24
>
>>>
>> 
>> Yes, you can do it at your own risk.
>
>
>I remember Linux Torvalds said somewhere that shared libraries are 
>actually a design flaw because of the complexity it generates in some 
>systems. There is no reason to use libraries that  weren't reviewed and
>
>tested by anyone, unless you're competent enough to understand what's 
>involved and read, review and test yourself. In this case, you should
>be 
>able to be in touch with the core development team on top of packaging.
>
>_______________________________________________
>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>_______________________________________________
>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/attachments/20171025/75337853/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list