[PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo

[ycollette.nospam at free.fr]

I activated SYSTEM_BOOST=ON in cmake and everything compiled fine too ...

----- Mail original -----
De: "ycollette nospam" <ycollette.nospam at free.fr>
À: "Bernardo Barros" <bernardobarros at gmail.com>
Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Octobre 2017 16:54:30
Objet: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo

Here, I put a spec file for SuperCollider. It builds fine on my machine.
The build is now queued on copr to see if everything is fine on a fedora build server:

https://github.com/ycollet/fedora-spec

----- Mail original -----
De: "Bernardo Barros" <bernardobarros at gmail.com>
À: "Yury Bulka" <setthemfree at privacyrequired.com>, planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Octobre 2017 16:29:29
Objet: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo

On 10/25/17 10:22, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> On 10/25/17 05:18, Yury Bulka wrote:
>> There seems to be an option in SC to build against system boost library:
>> https://github.com/supercollider/supercollider/blob/develop/CMakeLists.txt#L234 
>>
>>
>> And debian seems to be using it:
>> https://sources.debian.net/src/supercollider/1:3.7.0%7Erepack-4/debian/rules/#L24 
>>
> 
> Yes, you can do it at your own risk.


I remember Linux Torvalds said somewhere that shared libraries are 
actually a design flaw because of the complexity it generates in some 
systems. There is no reason to use libraries that  weren't reviewed and 
tested by anyone, unless you're competent enough to understand what's 
involved and read, review and test yourself. In this case, you should be 
able to be in touch with the core development team on top of packaging.

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma


_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma