[PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo
Nils Tonnätt
nils.tonnaett at posteo.de
Sun Oct 22 04:06:58 PDT 2017
When I started to get drumgizmo into main fedora, every new package
maintainer needed a mentor. I would like to help packaging again. But
finding a mentor could be the bigger problem than getting the package
into the right form.
There's Fedora Jam [1]. Maybe that's the right umbrella for us.
Links:
[1]: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/de/jam/
Am So, 22. Okt, 2017 um 10:25 schrieb Yury Bulka
<setthemfree at privacyrequired.com>:
> Let's take SuperCollider as an example. It is included in debian main,
> so it probably wouldn't have any licensing issues with fedora.
>
> How the process of moving it into main fedora would look like in
> general?
>
> Take the srpm, adapt it to Fedora's Packaging Guidelines [1] and
> submit
> to fedora?
>
> Then, I guess, the person doing it would have to take the
> responsibility
> of maintaining the fedora package.
>
> I could try doing it maybe, although I don't have much experience in
> packaging or C++ development. Is the knowledge of C++ absolutely
> required to be able to maintain a fedora package for SuperCollider?
>
> Links:
> [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
>
> Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarenskeen at zonnet.nl> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Yury Bulka wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I haven't posted here before, but after reading this list for a
>>> while
>>> I have an impression that we seem to expect too much work from a
>>> single person (Fernando) - providing -rt packages of the kernel,
>>> maintaining planeccrma repos, as well as maintaining fedora
>>> packages for
>>> supercollider and a whole bunch of other software...
>>>
>>> I'm thinking that maybe we could somehow distribute this work?
>>>
>>> For instance by trying to move *some* of the packages (like
>>> supercollider) from planetccrma to main fedora repos?
>>>
>>> How hard may that be? Is there anything about, say, supercollider,
>>> that
>>> would not allow it to be included in main fedora?
>>
>> Several packages that used to be part of PlanetCCRMA are now part of
>> the normal Fedora repos already. Due to, among others, Fedora's
>> strict
>> licencing policy not all PlanetCCRMA packages could/can be moved to
>> Fedora though.
>>
>> Fernando does a tremendous job maintaining the PlanetCCRMA
>> packages. I
>> totally agree that it would be great if he got some help from
>> others.
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/attachments/20171022/814f7393/attachment.html>
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list