[PlanetCCRMA] qtractor on planetccrma older than rpmfusion version?

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Sat May 15 20:51:18 PDT 2010


On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 17:53 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Niels Mayer wrote:
> > Looks like rpmfusion-free-updates carries the latest qtractor
> > (http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qtractor/qtractor-0.4.5.tar.gz
> > )
> >>
> >> > yum --enablerepo planetccrma list '*qtractor*'
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> qtractor.x86_64                0.4.5-1.fc12
> >> rpmfusion-free-updates
> >>
> >> qtractor-debuginfo.x86_64      0.4.3-0.1.fc12.ccrma       planetccrma
> 
> Yeah, it's one package that I not so carefully built for rpmfusion a
> long time ago and I kept updating it. I believe that is the only
> conflict between rpmfusion and planetccrma (correct me if I'm wrong).
> I originally intended to submit it to Fedora, but I didn't because of
> the lame (mp3 encoder) dependency.
> 
> I don't know what is the best way out of this. We could get rid of
> qtractor in either planetccrma or rpmfusion. I don't mind maintaining
> it at rpmfusion though. But then again, it is a 3rd party repo,
> relying on individuals who actually run it. From what I can tell,
> rpmfusion is going to be with us for a while.
> 
> Fernando, what's your take on this? I am fine either way.

Hard to tell which is the best option. I don't mind having it in Planet
CCRMA, I don't know if there are other audio/music stuff currently in
rpmfusion. 

-- Fernando




More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list