[PlanetCCRMA] Jack packaging.

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 02:06 +0100, Knut-Håvard Aksnes wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 16:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >   
> >> On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 00:10 +0100, Knut-Håvard Aksnes wrote:
> >>     
> >>>>>> Argh, I forgot to copy the .i386 versions to the x86_64 repository. I
> >>>>>> just did that. Could you please try again?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>> Which versions of the rpms should I expect?
> >>>>> The resulting errorlog after running:
> >>>>> yum -y wine >errorlog 2>&1 is attached.
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>           
> >>>> The versions you are getting are now fine (1.9.1-1.fc10.ccrma)
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you try this?
> >>>> Uninstall (forced) the x86_64 version:
> >>>>
> >>>>   rpm -e --nodeps jack-audio-connection-kit
> >>>>
> >>>> and then try to install both at the same time (I think this is the right
> >>>> way of doing it):
> >>>>
> >>>>   yum install jack-audio-connection-kit.i386
> >>>> jack-audio-connection-kit.x86_64
> >>>>
> >>>> (all in one line)
> >>>> ================================================================================
> >>>>         
> >>> Installing:
> >>>  jack-audio-connection-kit   x86_64   1.9.1-1.fc10.ccrma    planetccrma   1.5 M
> >>>  jack-audio-connection-kit   i386     1.9.1-1.fc10.ccrma    planetccrma   923 k
> >>>       
> >> Well, yes, those are the right packages. 
> >> I don't know what else you could try. 
> >>
> >> Perhaps try to install the i386 package manually with --excludedocs in
> >> the rpm command line?
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> hmmm ... ... ...
> >>
> >> I'll have to double check, maybe the files in question are actually
> >> different (looks like the only affected files are html), maybe those are
> >> generated and have something in them that makes them slightly
> >> different. 
> >>
> >> Never occurred to me, I'll have to check. 
> >
> > Bingo!
> >
> > The files are generated and include a _date of building_, and so are
> > different between the i386 and x86_64 packages!
> >
> > I'll fix asap (somehow)...
> >   
> One way of solving this is to move this is to change the spec file to 
> generate a noarch doc package.

I replaced the build date with the date of the svnversion.h file...
Just now I released 1.9.1-2

-- Fernando