[PlanetCCRMA] PlanetCCRMA *not* in the press

[Hector Centeno]

After reading the list of distros in that article (got the link from
yourpost at the Ardour list) I wondered the same thing: how come Planet
CCRMA is not here when is the most exhaustive and up to date Linux Audio
application repository? Also with one very hard working maintainer behind.

Hector


On 8/4/07, Stephan Neuhaus <sten at artdecode.de> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> Spiegel Online, one of Germany's most-read online magazines, has a brief
> article about making music under Linux.  See
> http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/tech/0,1518,497951,00.html
>
> Right at the top of the article, it says that "Linux users have the
> choice between at least five current distributions geared specially
> processing audio: 64 Studio, Dynabolic, Jacklab, Musix, and Ubuntu
> Studio." (my translation).
>
> There is no mention of PlanetCCRMA in the article.  This suggests that
> it keeps a slightly low profile among music distributions.  This may be
> deliberate; it just astonished me since I have been using PlanetCCRMA
> for so long :-)
>
> Anyway, have fun and keep up the good work,
>
> Stephan
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>



-- 
===============================
http://www.hcenteno.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/attachments/20070804/95c4fcdf/attachment.html>