[PlanetCCRMA] PlanetCCRMA *not* in the press
Hector Centeno
hcengar@gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 18:38:01 2007
------=_Part_124964_2283239.1186277822565
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
After reading the list of distros in that article (got the link from
yourpost at the Ardour list) I wondered the same thing: how come Planet
CCRMA is not here when is the most exhaustive and up to date Linux Audio
application repository? Also with one very hard working maintainer behind.
Hector
On 8/4/07, Stephan Neuhaus <sten@artdecode.de> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> Spiegel Online, one of Germany's most-read online magazines, has a brief
> article about making music under Linux. See
> http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/tech/0,1518,497951,00.html
>
> Right at the top of the article, it says that "Linux users have the
> choice between at least five current distributions geared specially
> processing audio: 64 Studio, Dynabolic, Jacklab, Musix, and Ubuntu
> Studio." (my translation).
>
> There is no mention of PlanetCCRMA in the article. This suggests that
> it keeps a slightly low profile among music distributions. This may be
> deliberate; it just astonished me since I have been using PlanetCCRMA
> for so long :-)
>
> Anyway, have fun and keep up the good work,
>
> Stephan
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
--
===============================
http://www.hcenteno.net
------=_Part_124964_2283239.1186277822565
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
After reading the list of distros in that article (got the link from
yourpost at the Ardour list) I wondered the same thing: how
come Planet CCRMA is not here when is the most exhaustive and up to
date Linux Audio application repository? Also with one very hard working maintainer behind.<br>
<br>
Hector<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/4/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Stephan Neuhaus</b> <<a href="mailto:sten@artdecode.de">sten@artdecode.de</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Dear list,<br><br>Spiegel Online, one of Germany's most-read online magazines, has a brief<br>article about making music under Linux. See<br><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/tech/0,1518,497951,00.html">http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/tech/0,1518,497951,00.html
</a><br><br>Right at the top of the article, it says that "Linux users have the<br>choice between at least five current distributions geared specially<br>processing audio: 64 Studio, Dynabolic, Jacklab, Musix, and Ubuntu
<br>Studio." (my translation).<br><br>There is no mention of PlanetCCRMA in the article. This suggests that<br>it keeps a slightly low profile among music distributions. This may be<br>deliberate; it just astonished me since I have been using PlanetCCRMA
<br>for so long :-)<br><br>Anyway, have fun and keep up the good work,<br><br>Stephan<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>PlanetCCRMA mailing list<br><a href="mailto:PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu">PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
</a><br><a href="http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma">http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>===============================
<br><a href="http://www.hcenteno.net">http://www.hcenteno.net</a>
------=_Part_124964_2283239.1186277822565--