[PlanetCCRMA] Gnome vs. KDE - Operability within the confines of
Planet CCRMA
Matt Marian
matt1@mtmm.ath.cx
Thu Apr 6 12:20:03 2006
Hi Roy,
no flame bait here either :-)
Strictly speaking from the practical side of being a user and not a
developer. I have and do use both and even xfce4 . . I have not seen any
problems using any one of them , as far as performance is concerned.
Maybe I should say no perceptible issues.
I have not googled this , but one would imagine studies out there
documenting latency , memory allocation, cpu cycles, screen refresh etc
of each desktop/window manager over the other. I have encounted no
issues using either. but that's just me and I could be wrong.
Cheers,
Matt
have fun & make music.
Roy Vestal wrote:
> Ok, first, this is not to start a flame war. I'm not asking personal
> preference, but operability as it pertains to Planet CCRMA and the
> software. Now with that out of the way....
>
> I'm a KDE user. However, I've noticed a lot of the GUI's in Planet
> CCRMA seem to be more oriented, at least in the descriptions, toward
> Gnome. Is there any benefit to using Gnome over KDE for Planet CCRMA,
> other than just personal preference?
>
> TIA,
> Roy
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>