[PlanetCCRMA] Most stable CCRMA with all audio video apps

[Spec]

I think it may be me getting rpms in a knot by installing various 
libraries from source and nvidia drivers etc...
reckon I'll do an upgrade to FC4 and see how it goes....

and I'll test pd/gem b4 upgrade to nvidia drivers....

Jamie Bullock wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have Gem v.0.9 working perfectly on my FC3/PlanetCCRMA-2.6.10 box.
>Have you tried a different graphics driver? If you still can't compile,
>I would suggest asking the PD mailing list for help, rather than
>changing distros, as the latter could just pose a different set of
>problems.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jamie
>
>On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 01:11 +0100, Spec wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello again all!
>>Further to last post re: my FC3 CCRMA where Gem seems to lock up all 
>>linux and keyboard (cant even get virtual console), I was messing with 
>>compiling and it seems that some of the libraries have made major chages 
>>(libdv no longer has a dv1394.h header for example) where the 
>>application sources are expecting different compilers and library 
>>versions etc.  No matter what I tried Gem still locks linux on 
>>destroying a graphics window after some examples most notably the gem 
>>08.model.pd example in the 01. basic directory which always locks it!  
>>(but could that be nvidia driver?  glxgears seems working much faster so 
>>I'm guessing the driver is working)
>>
>>Could anyone say which is the best fedora core to use or should I go all 
>>the way back to RH9, I want to use PD and gem, and cinelerra (that sort 
>>of compiles and almost works....) in fact the full set of CCRMA packages 
>>and the nvidia drivers (which one is stable?) for dual head tv out and 
>>3d accel.
>>Any comments appreciated!
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>    
>>