[PlanetCCRMA] Fedora 1 or 2

[Patrick - DJUnderground.com]

I've been reading up on a bunch of sites, and they only seem to list 
stable success with kernel 2.4.  Is this because there is no 
documentation for 2.6 kernel, or the implementations for low latency 
that were supposed to be included werent?

Patrick




R Parker wrote:

>--- Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:08:37PM -0700, Ken wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>   I'd like to install Fedora and Planet, should I
>>>      
>>>
>>go ahead with core 1, or
>>    
>>
>>>   wait for core 2?  Can you upgrade easily from 1
>>>      
>>>
>>to 2?  Thanks,
>>    
>>
>>>   Ken
>>>      
>>>
>>I've upgraded from 1 to 2 on a few machines and it
>>went quite smoothly.
>>The planet packages may need a bit of cooercion to
>>force an upgrade, I
>>think I had to remove the -core package and install
>>the new one.A
>>    
>>
>
>Aside from coercing the packages, how do you do an
>upgrade? Is it as simple as pointing to the
>appropriate application repository and hitting the
>Synaptic Distribution upgrade button? 
>
>Is there upgrade documents we should read?
>
>I noticed Fernando likes to do an installation rather
>than an upgrade.
>
>I suppose it's not a bad idea to upgrade from RH9 to
>FC1 if for no other reason than to prepare for the 2.6
>kernel. Should I bother? I would be upgrading a backup
>machine and not the main studio work box.
>
>Ron
>
>  
>
>>- Steve
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
>>
>>    
>>
>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>  
>
>
>
>
>		
>_______________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
>http://vote.yahoo.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>
>  
>