[PlanetCCRMA] Re: Apt problems]

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Fri Nov 26 14:15:02 2004


On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 13:32, William M. Quarles wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 11:55, William M. Quarles wrote:
> >>William M. Quarles wrote:
> >>
> >>>Back to my third Up2Date test, I found something curious... if the 
> >>>packages that would otherwise "conflict" are being downloaded together, 
> >>>then Up2Date doesn't complain about them (i.e. the LADSPA plugins).  So 
> >>>this list isn't necessarily complete either, but check it out.
> >>
> >>I got the flipside to the LADSPA plugins conflict.  My theory is that 
> >>they will all conflict with each other. I think this is my last test, 
> >>unless you can think of anything else to do.
> > 
> > Not really, except to try with yum instead of apt, just in case the
> > update logic in up2date using yum is better than the one for apt. 
> 
> Considering that I really have not had this problem with any of the
> other repositories that I have been using, I think you should look into
> this. 

Maybe the other repositories don't trigger the bug. Or have better
packages :-) Just curious, any other repository you use has a kernel
available?

I could eventually "solve" the ladspa problem by not sharing the
directory between the packages. But I would just be masking the problem
in up2date (IMHO), rpm itself does not complain about any conflicts when
installing the packages, why should up2date? 

And what about redhat-menus and the kernel? I'm using virtually the same
spec file as fedora. So I'm not doing, in that case, anything different
from fedora itself and still you get an error... 

> I was going to report a bug to fedora.us, but it appears that we
> are having the same error with the Yum repository as we were having with
> the Apt repository when using Up2Date, so I am not going to make the
> report. 

Hmmm, why fedora.us? Up2Date should be the responsability of Fedora
itself, it is a core package that is not maintained by fedora.us, I
think.

> There's probably somebody on the Fedora developers' list
> familiar enough with Up2Date to give us some advice on this issue.

Yes, maybe that would be an option. 
Sorry that yum is not working either...
-- Fernando