[PlanetCCRMA] ladspa-sdk -> ladspa: the never ending saga

Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Thu Mar 18 13:58:01 2004

> > I finally gave up and rebuilt all ladspa plugin packages that had
> > explicit references to ladspa-sdk (the old name), so that they don't
> > need that, and rebuilt ladspa itself to not "Provide:" ladspa-sdk,
> > something I initially did to mantain backwards compatibility with the
> > older packages). So "ladspa-sdk" does not exist any more in the package
> > repository for Fedora Core 1. 
> This is probably not the tmie to mention it it, but most LADSPA plugin
> packages probably dont need ladspa.h or the SDK. They can/should
> internalise the .h file, and thats all you need.
> I haven't required it for a long time.

Well, they should require it to build, but not to run, right?
-- Fernando