[PlanetCCRMA] planet-ccrma kernel 2.4.20-4.ll on redhat 9
Josh Steiner
josh at vitriolix.com
Fri Apr 18 12:38:01 PDT 2003
hey star (i think you are stalking me... how many mailing lists are we
on now? 4? ;)
it turned out that i just needed apt 4.2 not 4.1, i managed to (finally)
find an up to date rpm at apt.freshrpms.net ... i'm installing
planet-ccrma as we speak, i'll let y'all know how it goes :)
-josh
shift8 wrote:
>hi josh!
>
>your rh 9 problem is related to your version of rpm. you need to have
>the version that built the package, most likely rpm-4.1-1.06 on a stock
>rh 8. i haven't really checked, but my guess the that the ccrma
>apt-get repository is for 8.0/7.3 systems. rh 9 is only like 2 weeks
>old...
>
>martin - alsa is hard with any system ;) on the kernel issue, you can't
>just build an rpm of it had have it work like that. the idea is that
>you download the srpm, install it, run make config (or xconfig, or
>menuconfig), change all of the kernel opts to match your hardware in the
>/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-4.ll.acpi dir, then edit the .spec for the rpm (in
>/usr/src/rehat/SPECS) to have the pre-install section copy your .config
>generated from the above make to the source tree, then run rpmbuild...
>
>i know i've left out some steps, but that would be the general idea. if
>you really want to do this, you need to read the rpm-howtos, the
>kernel-build howtos, etc....
>
>if your system is working with the downgraded ccrma kernel, you don't
>have to do any of these things :) you don't need to delete anything
>ether (you should keep everything in /boot and /lib/modules in case you
>ever need/want to boot the original 2.4.20-9)
>
>my recommendation for both? use 8.0 ;)
>
>-star
>
>On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 11:53, Josh Steiner wrote:
>
>
>>hi martin, did you upgrade over a redhat 8 + planetccrma box? I havnt
>>figured out what i'm missing to get apt working on redhat 9 yet...
>>
>>-Josh
>>
>>Martin Dupras wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have upgraded my linux laptop about a week ago to redhat linux 9. It
>>>worked fine but I never could manage to get ALSA working.
>>>
>>>I downgraded my kernel to the planet-ccrma 2.4.20-4.ll.acpi kernel,
>>>and now things are pretty much all fine and groovy. But…
>>>
>>>I need to recompile a few things which need the kernel sources to be
>>>there. I got the kernel-2.4.20-4.ll.acpi.src.rpm. I followed the
>>>instructions on the planet-ccrma site but for some reason it will not
>>>build.
>>>
>>>I tried rpmbuild –ba kernel-2.4.20-4.ll.acpi.src.rpm, and that goes on
>>>compiling for maybe an hour, yet there are very many warnings (more
>>>than I would expect from recompiling a kernel), and the rpmbuild exits
>>>with errors, before creating an RPM or SRPM package. It does appear,
>>>however to create sources in /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-4.ll.acpi.
>>>
>>>I also checked that /usr/src/linux-2.4 is a link to
>>>/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-4.ll.acpi.
>>>
>>>Does anyone have any advice? I have a feeling that some things are
>>>left over from 2.4.20-9 that I had with the RH9 install, yet I don’t
>>>know where to look for them, and what obsolete files if any I can
>>>safely delete.
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>- martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>____________________________________________________
>>independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>>PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PlanetCCRMA mailing list
>PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
>http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>
--
____________________________________________________
independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list