[CM] Bug in (apply set! ..)
chris.actondev at gmail.com
Mon Feb 21 15:29:30 PST 2022
Oh, I have been missing something:
"[..] and set! evaluates its second argument, so [..]"
I now realize that to see get the behavior I was going after I needed to
(apply set! 'x (quote 'bar) ())
I guess it's not inconsistent at all, I just completely missed the double
evaluation going on with the 2nd argument.
Thanks for the thorough explanation & sorry for the wrong alarm!
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 00:12, <bil at ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
> Maybe it's inconsistent with (apply + a b) where
> there's only one evaluation of a and b? Hmmm.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cmdist