<div dir="ltr"><div>Oh, I have been missing something:<br></div><div>"[..] and set! evaluates its second argument, so [..]"</div><div><br></div><div>I now realize that to see get the behavior I was going after I needed to</div><div><br></div><div>(apply set! 'x (quote 'bar) ())</div><div><br></div><div>I guess it's not inconsistent at all, I just completely missed the double evaluation going on with the 2nd argument.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the thorough explanation & sorry for the wrong alarm!<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 00:12, <<a href="mailto:bil@ccrma.stanford.edu">bil@ccrma.stanford.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Maybe it's inconsistent with (apply + a b) where<br>
there's only one evaluation of a and b? Hmmm.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>