[CM] Resampling in SND

[Kjetil S. Matheussen]

Are you sure its possible to hear any difference? I don't know, but they 
both use the sinc algorithm, and a short benchmarks I did two years ago 
showed that snd's resampler using a low src-width use a lot less cpu than 
libsamplerate.



On Tue, 22 May 2007, Juan Pampin wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> I was wondering how hard would it be to add support in snd to use
> libsamplerate (or secret rabbit code: http://www.mega-nerd.com/SRC/) I
> have been using this library for high-quality sampling rate conversion
> with very good results (I guess it's what programs like Ardour and
> Audacity use too).
> Best,
> JUAN
>
> On 5/22/07, Bill Schottstaedt <bil at ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> >  It is never stated what the first case ('num') is supposed to
>> >  represent.
>>
>>  Hunh?? The very next sentences are:
>>
>>  "A value greater than 1.0 causes the sound to be transposed up.
>>  A value less than 0.0 causes the sound to be reversed."
>>
>>  I'll add another example,
>>  but there are dozens scattered around the *.scm files, and
>>  in the src-channel documentation directly above src-sound.
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Cmdist mailing list
>>  Cmdist at ccrma.stanford.edu
>>  http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cmdist mailing list
> Cmdist at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
>
>