[CM] [FTH] Bus error with FTH --forth-repl...

[Charles Turner]

Michael Scholz wrote on 3/15/07 at 1:48 PM

>For a normal repl (like Ruby or Scheme repls with printing the current
>stack values, i.e. the result of the last eval) calling `fth' is
>enough.  Argument --forth-repl means, the stack remains untouched
>after evaling your command line much like gforth's repl.

Yes, it's very nice the default configuration, but all of the other
Forths that I use don't work this way, so it's pretty disconcerting for
me...

I'm switched over to using the FTH CVS, so the fix on this end will be
easy

>Thank you very much for reporting the bug!

Thanks for fixing it so quickly! I hope soon I might be able to fix some
of these things myself rather than making lots of work for you!

All the best, Charles

<vze26m98@optonline.net>