[CM] More XP & CLM

[Dave Phillips]

Bill Schottstaedt wrote:

>>If it's not going to work with 
>>Windows, or if the developers can't or won't support it, then the 
>>developers should just say so. 
>>    
>>
>
>"can't or won't" seems a bit harsh -- 
>
Yes, I apologize for the wording, I didn't mean it to read so negatively 
(it looks bad to me too). I was thinking more of the actual time and 
energies involved, that the development crew is already pretty well 
occupied.

s/should/would

>I think CLM does work in Windows
>in ACL, thanks to the dogged determination of Michael Edwards; I'd
>love for it to work in every case, but I already have a long list of things
>I'm not doing -- it's more a kind of programming triage.  If anyone
>with Windows (and some experience with programming in it) and a
>lot of patience (porting and debugging can seem like a infinite loop
>sometimes) -- where was I?  I'm too old for a sentence that convoluted.
>What I mean is, if there's a willing helper, I'm willing to try.
>
Alas, by this time I've forgotten what it's like to work with Windows, 
and I know nothing about setting up a development environment. I am 
considering setting up a machine to test and use Windows music and sound 
software, but I doubt I'll have the time to dedicate to development on 
that box.

Best,

dp