[CM] CM - event scheduling feature request[?]

[Bill Sack]

great! and if one of the objects you're scheduling happens to be a single
(non-list) object, all you have to do is wrap it in a (list ... of its own,
like:

(events (append (list (single ...))
                           (multiple ...)) etc.

thank you, rick

-bill

On 4/25/07, Rick Taube <taube at uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> offsets are lined up 1-to-1 with objects. since the (test ..)
> function is returning pairs of objects the offsets need to be paired
> as well
> On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Landspeedrecord wrote:
>
> > Why is the duplication of the time offsets necessary?  Does it have
> > something to do with list vs. append or is it because the processes
> > are macros returning code?
> >
> >
> > On 4/24/07, Rick Taube <taube at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> >> you are correct sublists are not supported now -- i cant remember why
> >> that is the case or if there is a good reason. given the current
> >> functionality,  if you change your outer to (APPEND ...) and then pad
> >> your times it should work
> >>
> >> (events (append (test ...)
> >>                  (test ...)
> >>                  (test ...))
> >>          '(0 0 1 1 2 2))
> >>
> >> i
> >>
> >> On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Sack wrote:
> >>
> >> > am i infact doing something wrong here, and if not, is it possible
> >> > in some future cm version to make scheduling of these kind of
> >> > processes possible?
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cmdist mailing list
> >> Cmdist at ccrma.stanford.edu
> >> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
> >>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/cmdist/attachments/20070425/9591cd25/attachment.html>