[CM] CM - event scheduling feature request[?]
Bill Sack
bsack23@gmail.com
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:24 -0400
------=_Part_222527_17570786.1177512444706
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
great! and if one of the objects you're scheduling happens to be a single
(non-list) object, all you have to do is wrap it in a (list ... of its own,
like:
(events (append (list (single ...))
(multiple ...)) etc.
thank you, rick
-bill
On 4/25/07, Rick Taube <taube@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> offsets are lined up 1-to-1 with objects. since the (test ..)
> function is returning pairs of objects the offsets need to be paired
> as well
> On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Landspeedrecord wrote:
>
> > Why is the duplication of the time offsets necessary? Does it have
> > something to do with list vs. append or is it because the processes
> > are macros returning code?
> >
> >
> > On 4/24/07, Rick Taube <taube@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> >> you are correct sublists are not supported now -- i cant remember why
> >> that is the case or if there is a good reason. given the current
> >> functionality, if you change your outer to (APPEND ...) and then pad
> >> your times it should work
> >>
> >> (events (append (test ...)
> >> (test ...)
> >> (test ...))
> >> '(0 0 1 1 2 2))
> >>
> >> i
> >>
> >> On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Sack wrote:
> >>
> >> > am i infact doing something wrong here, and if not, is it possible
> >> > in some future cm version to make scheduling of these kind of
> >> > processes possible?
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cmdist mailing list
> >> Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
> >> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
> >>
>
>
------=_Part_222527_17570786.1177512444706
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
great! and if one of the objects you're scheduling happens to be a single (non-list) object, all you have to do is wrap it in a (list ... of its own, like:<br><br>(events (append (list (single ...))<br> (multiple ...)) etc.
<br><br>thank you, rick<br><br>-bill<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rick Taube</b> <<a href="mailto:taube@uiuc.edu">taube@uiuc.edu</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
offsets are lined up 1-to-1 with objects. since the (test ..)<br>function is returning pairs of objects the offsets need to be paired<br>as well<br>On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Landspeedrecord wrote:<br><br>> Why is the duplication of the time offsets necessary? Does it have
<br>> something to do with list vs. append or is it because the processes<br>> are macros returning code?<br>><br>><br>> On 4/24/07, Rick Taube <<a href="mailto:taube@uiuc.edu">taube@uiuc.edu</a>> wrote:
<br>>> you are correct sublists are not supported now -- i cant remember why<br>>> that is the case or if there is a good reason. given the current<br>>> functionality, if you change your outer to (APPEND ...) and then pad
<br>>> your times it should work<br>>><br>>> (events (append (test ...)<br>>> (test ...)<br>>> (test ...))<br>>> '(0 0 1 1 2 2))<br>>>
<br>>> i<br>>><br>>> On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Sack wrote:<br>>><br>>> > am i infact doing something wrong here, and if not, is it possible<br>>> > in some future cm version to make scheduling of these kind of
<br>>> > processes possible?<br>>> ><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> Cmdist mailing list<br>>> <a href="mailto:Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu">Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
</a><br>>> <a href="http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist">http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist</a><br>>><br><br></blockquote></div><br>
------=_Part_222527_17570786.1177512444706--