[CM] CM - event scheduling feature request[?]

Bill Sack bsack23@gmail.com
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:47:24 -0400


------=_Part_222527_17570786.1177512444706
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

great! and if one of the objects you're scheduling happens to be a single
(non-list) object, all you have to do is wrap it in a (list ... of its own,
like:

(events (append (list (single ...))
                           (multiple ...)) etc.

thank you, rick

-bill

On 4/25/07, Rick Taube <taube@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> offsets are lined up 1-to-1 with objects. since the (test ..)
> function is returning pairs of objects the offsets need to be paired
> as well
> On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Landspeedrecord wrote:
>
> > Why is the duplication of the time offsets necessary?  Does it have
> > something to do with list vs. append or is it because the processes
> > are macros returning code?
> >
> >
> > On 4/24/07, Rick Taube <taube@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> >> you are correct sublists are not supported now -- i cant remember why
> >> that is the case or if there is a good reason. given the current
> >> functionality,  if you change your outer to (APPEND ...) and then pad
> >> your times it should work
> >>
> >> (events (append (test ...)
> >>                  (test ...)
> >>                  (test ...))
> >>          '(0 0 1 1 2 2))
> >>
> >> i
> >>
> >> On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Sack wrote:
> >>
> >> > am i infact doing something wrong here, and if not, is it possible
> >> > in some future cm version to make scheduling of these kind of
> >> > processes possible?
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cmdist mailing list
> >> Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
> >> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
> >>
>
>

------=_Part_222527_17570786.1177512444706
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

great! and if one of the objects you&#39;re scheduling happens to be a single (non-list) object, all you have to do is wrap it in a (list ... of its own, like:<br><br>(events (append (list (single ...))<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (multiple ...)) etc.
<br><br>thank you, rick<br><br>-bill<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rick Taube</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:taube@uiuc.edu">taube@uiuc.edu</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
offsets are lined up 1-to-1 with objects. since the (test ..)<br>function is returning pairs of objects the offsets need to be paired<br>as well<br>On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Landspeedrecord wrote:<br><br>&gt; Why is the duplication of the time offsets necessary?&nbsp;&nbsp;Does it have
<br>&gt; something to do with list vs. append or is it because the processes<br>&gt; are macros returning code?<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; On 4/24/07, Rick Taube &lt;<a href="mailto:taube@uiuc.edu">taube@uiuc.edu</a>&gt; wrote:
<br>&gt;&gt; you are correct sublists are not supported now -- i cant remember why<br>&gt;&gt; that is the case or if there is a good reason. given the current<br>&gt;&gt; functionality,&nbsp;&nbsp;if you change your outer to (APPEND ...) and then pad
<br>&gt;&gt; your times it should work<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; (events (append (test ...)<br>&gt;&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(test ...)<br>&gt;&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(test ...))<br>&gt;&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#39;(0 0 1 1 2 2))<br>&gt;&gt;
<br>&gt;&gt; i<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Sack wrote:<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; &gt; am i infact doing something wrong here, and if not, is it possible<br>&gt;&gt; &gt; in some future cm version to make scheduling of these kind of
<br>&gt;&gt; &gt; processes possible?<br>&gt;&gt; &gt;<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________<br>&gt;&gt; Cmdist mailing list<br>&gt;&gt; <a href="mailto:Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu">Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
</a><br>&gt;&gt; <a href="http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist">http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist</a><br>&gt;&gt;<br><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_222527_17570786.1177512444706--