[CM] CM - event scheduling feature request[?]

Rick Taube taube@uiuc.edu
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:07:22 -0500


offsets are lined up 1-to-1 with objects. since the (test ..)  
function is returning pairs of objects the offsets need to be paired  
as well
On Apr 24, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Landspeedrecord wrote:

> Why is the duplication of the time offsets necessary?  Does it have
> something to do with list vs. append or is it because the processes
> are macros returning code?
>
>
> On 4/24/07, Rick Taube <taube@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>> you are correct sublists are not supported now -- i cant remember why
>> that is the case or if there is a good reason. given the current
>> functionality,  if you change your outer to (APPEND ...) and then pad
>> your times it should work
>>
>> (events (append (test ...)
>>                  (test ...)
>>                  (test ...))
>>          '(0 0 1 1 2 2))
>>
>> i
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Bill Sack wrote:
>>
>> > am i infact doing something wrong here, and if not, is it possible
>> > in some future cm version to make scheduling of these kind of
>> > processes possible?
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cmdist mailing list
>> Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
>> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
>>