[CM] 2nd International Linux Audio Conference
Rick Taube
taube@uiuc.edu
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:02:52 -0500
i think for the term "real-time composition" to mean anything then the
composer that follows this model should require exactly 60- minutes to
write a 60 minute piece and never go back and change their mind about
any note (or whatever) that they claim they are composing durring that
time. Not even Hydan did that! And if they are not doing this then
there should be another name for what they are doing. I think
composition is about makeing something as good as it can be -- and so
i dont see how it is possible to remove reflection, interation,
revisitation and refinement from what composition is. These all involve
going back and changing something such that -- if it ever happens -- it
will be better. That is not real time, or if it is then the term means
nothing. I think its only random chance when composition is in real
time. Sometimes the composition process is "faster than real time",
like the sudden moment in which you understand what the next minute of
the pieve will be. Usually is slower, like when you actually make that
minute be as good as it can be. For me this process is much more likely
to involve hours or days than it is to take a minute. It once took me 9
months to write a 22 minute piece, that's a 388800/22 compute ratio!