[CM] which lisp/scheme for future use?

[Anders Vinjar]

>>> "RT" == Rick Taube <taube@uiuc.edu> writes:

    RT> very true, but equally true even if you stay inside
    RT> lisp.

To a lesser extent.  Its possible now - and very useful - to send
user-defined constructs, lambda-expressions, methods, general
hooks etc. around together with the other musical objects between
cm/cmn/clm, and have them do their work based on context/class.
In a standard exchange-format i doubt this type of work will be
supported.

When doing instrumental scores in cmn i find i always put in
functions based on #'engorge or the various hooks of the score.
The result is available also when creating cm-entitities from the
cmn-score.