[CM] Let's hear from CM 1.x users(?)

Rick Taube taube@uiuc.edu
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:43:53 -0600

>different ways (as once containers called 'thread' and 'merge'). The new
>container type 'seq' is similar to 'merge', something similar to
>'thread' is missing (is it?). I know I could mimic a thread by
>specifying offset times, but I prefer the abstraction of a thread. 

i think i could add thread back in and its probably worth the while to do it.

>functions of the old API in CM 2. I did not check that carefully, but I
>did not found functions as add-object, object-position, print-object

no, these are still there:


there is the additional advantage in the newer version that you can use all the lisp sequencing fucntions  directly on the slot value, that is, the subobjects are now just a regular lisp list of data. this wasnt the case in cm1