<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Robert,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Are you referring to the license or the possibility that some concepts implemented in STK may be covered by patents? &nbsp;Since the digital waveguide patent has expired, I would guess there are no longer any problems.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">—gary</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 5, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Robert Thompson &lt;<a href="mailto:rdthompson2013@icloud.com" class="">rdthompson2013@icloud.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div class="">Hello Gary and Ariel,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">My interest in STK and any audio code is for a commercial embedded IoT product for my use case (hearing impairment, chronic tinnitus therapy/meditation, health etc).&nbsp;</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There's an upside and downside for this,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">From&nbsp;<a href="https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/stk/information.html" class="">https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/stk/information.html</a>&nbsp;</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">1. "<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">The Synthesis ToolKit is extremely portable (it's mostly platform-independent C and C++ code), and it's completely user-extensible (all source included, no unusual libraries, and no hidden drivers)"</span></div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">This has always been the primary upside.</span></div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">2. "The only parts of the Synthesis ToolKit that are platform-dependent concern real-time audio and MIDI"</span></div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class="">It sounds like this comes from the NextStep (NS...) &nbsp;origin and I'm assuming it's independent from the Mach OS kernel, or is this macOS/X or iOS?</div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class=""><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">3. Then there's the "</span><span style="font-weight: bold; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">Legal and Ethical Notes</span>"</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I can't write potential &nbsp;backers who have interest in health solutions, including my particular situation (hearing impairment, user customizable enhancement) unless I can clarify this language to them in much briefer terms.&nbsp;</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks.&nbsp;</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">~ Robert&nbsp;</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">Sent from my iPhone</div></div><div class=""><br class="">On Aug 5, 2016, at 12:16 PM, Gary Scavone &lt;<a href="mailto:gary@ccrma.stanford.edu" class="">gary@ccrma.Stanford.EDU</a>&gt; wrote:<br class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8" class="">Hi Ariel,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks for the offer to help. &nbsp;The current release is only about 6 months old, which is fairly “new” from my perspective. &nbsp;And unless I’m missing something, there has only been one merged pull request since then. &nbsp;The two pending pull requests have been replied to but I didn’t get subsequent feedback from the contributors. &nbsp;My feeling is that #58 is not a bug but rather based on the contributor using the class in an incorrect way.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There are several “issues", but I don’t know when I would be able to address them. &nbsp;In general, if someone wants something fixed, they should fix it themselves and then submit a pull request.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There have been a number of updates to the RtMidi and RtAudio classes, but again, I’m not sure they are significant enough to substantiate a new release.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">—gary</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 3, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Ariel Elkin &lt;<a href="mailto:arielelkin@gmail.com" class="">arielelkin@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><font size="3" class="">Hi all,</font><div class=""><font size="3" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font size="3" class="">Several bug fixes and improvements have been accumulating since v4.5.2, it'd be good to draft a new release.&nbsp;</font></div><div class=""><font size="3" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font size="3" class="">Also, two pull requests need to be reviewed:</font></div><div class=""><font size="3" class=""><a href="https://github.com/thestk/stk/pulls" class="">https://github.com/thestk/stk/pulls</a><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font size="3" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font size="3" class="">And i</font><span style="font-size: inherit;" class="">ssues have also been accumulating:</span></div><div class=""><span style="font-size: inherit;" class=""><a href="https://github.com/thestk/stk/issues" class="">https://github.com/thestk/stk/issues</a></span></div><div class=""><span style="font-size: inherit;" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class=""><span style="font-size: inherit;" class="">As far as I'm concerned, I can&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: inherit;" class="">(as always)&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: inherit;" class="">provide all the support needed for iOS, but I don't have (at this stage) the required background knowledge for maintaining an STK project on OS X, nor a Linux or Windows machine for development.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: inherit;" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class=""><span style="font-size: inherit;" class=""><br class="">So I think it would be good if&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: inherit;" class="">we clarify who is responsible for dealing with new issues, pull requests, and overall maintenance. This would make maintenance and development more efficient in the long term.</span></div><div class=""><span style="font-size: inherit;" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div class=""><span style="font-size: inherit;" class="">Ariel</span></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Stk mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Stk@ccrma.stanford.edu" class="">Stk@ccrma.stanford.edu</a><br class=""><a href="https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk" class="">https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk</a><br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class=""><span class="">Stk mailing list</span><br class=""><span class=""><a href="mailto:Stk@ccrma.stanford.edu" class="">Stk@ccrma.stanford.edu</a></span><br class=""><span class=""><a href="https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk" class="">https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stk</a></span><br class=""></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>