[PlanetCCRMA] State of Fedora 26 repo

Yury Bulka setthemfree at privacyrequired.com
Wed Oct 25 02:18:24 PDT 2017

There seems to be an option in SC to build against system boost library:

And debian seems to be using it:

Yury Bulka <setthemfree at privacyrequired.com> writes:

> Do I understand correctly that at present moment SC includes their own
> versions of third-party libs?
> bernardobarros at gmail.com writes:
>> On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 12:00 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>> I don't think there are any licensing issues. At some point I think 
>>> there was a problem with boost as SC needed its own version (and
>>> Fedora 
>>> does not like that, you have to link with existing libraries instead
>>> of 
>>> using a different one).
>> I don't think that's a good idea. Even sc developers don't know for
>> sure what can go wrong with a boost lib update. 
>> I think an independent repository will always be necessary for such
>> cases, and for the realtime kernel.
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list