[PlanetCCRMA] new computer - hp spectre

Oded Ben-Tal obental at gmail.com
Sun May 7 01:29:43 PDT 2017


These are the main(?) errors I see in /var/log/messages
May  7 00:12:43 cali kernel: ACPI Error: Field [D128] at 1152 exceeds
Buffer [NULL] size 160 (bits) (20160831/dsopcode-236)
May  7 00:12:43 cali kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed
[\HWMC] (Node ffff9f7f060da2a8), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20160831/psparse-543)

May  7 00:12:43 cali dbus-daemon[904]: [system] Rejected send message, 1
matched rules; type="error", sender=":1.43" (uid=1000 pid=1791
comm="/usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog "
label="unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023")
interface="(unset)" member="(unset)" error
name="org.bluez.MediaEndpoint1.Error.NotImplemented" requested_reply="0"
destination=":1.2" (uid=0 pid=898 comm="/usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd "
label="system_u:system_r:bluetooth_t:s0")

May  7 00:51:36 cali kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event
TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 5 comp_code 1May  7 00:51:36
cali kernel: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not
part of current TD ep_index 5 comp_code 1

Thanks for the links I'll check things. Do you know how I find out if the
omputer has optimus or not? I see that the nvidia card I have (GeForce
940MX) is listed by nvidia with optimus technolgies does that mean I should
try following this
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/NVIDIA_Optimus
and hope that it works?
I'm getting used to working with the touchpad without buttons (and its also
a touch screen and comes with the pen so I'm trying that as an interface).
Thanks
Oded


On 7 May 2017 at 01:35, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando at ccrma.stanford.edu>
wrote:

> On 05/05/2017 12:54 PM, Oded Ben-Tal wrote:
>
>> So, I finally got my new computer on Wednesday and I can give some
>> preliminary report in case you are interested.
>>
>
> Thanks!,
>
> I got a 15" HP spectre with SSD HD.
>> Install Fedora was not a real problem (I made some mistakes along the
>> way about partitioning but that is entirly my own fault. No damage just
>> lost a few hours trying to sort the mess I created )
>> I tried getting the nvidia card to work but I couldn't get the akmod
>> kernel to compile.
>>
>
> Any errors you can see?
>
> I also see some acpi related errors, and yesterday it
>> froze when I tried to shut it down. Many restarts were fine. I got the
>> rt kernel installed and was able to get the sound interface (rme
>> babyface as recommended here) working. It seems to be working better
>> then on my older thinkpad. But only tested very briefly.
>> So I'm using the integrated graphic for now, not nvidia.
>>
>
> What kind of graphics architecture does it have? Optimus? Or a true dual
> graphic card?
>
> The screen is
>> large and very high resolution and I'm not sure the desktop environment
>> (I've been using xfce, maybe I should have chose kde?) is designed for
>> that. Still, after tweaking the settings, enlarging the fonts etc. I'm
>> getting used to it.
>>
>
> I went through the same when I got the Lenovo a while back (W540 - not
> buying Lenovo again for many reasons). The display is 3K, 2880 x 1620. It
> is great and I would not go back to 1920x1080 :-) I also had to do a lot of
> tweaking to get things to render more or less right.
>
> I'm using the Cinnamon desktop and I kind of like it (old style and look -
> I added the Chrome theme and it looks pretty nice).
>
> Cinnamon detects the display density and tries to correct for that, it has
> a setting you can change but with a 3K display things are wither too small
> or a bit too big (I see you have a 4K display so maybe it will do the right
> thing for you). This is from notes that are old so things might have
> changed:
>
> ----
> the current solution is to set "scaling-factor" to "1" in dconf-editor,
> org.cinnamon.desktop.interface; then text-scaling-factor = 1.5 or 1.6.
> This fixes the font size, sort of. Window decorations are a bit too big,
> that apparently is a known problem. Then the panels are too small so change
> the size to a bigger one. Almost usable.
> ----
>
> And:
>
> ----
> - Firefox and DPI:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox_tweaks#Configur
> e_the_DPI_value
>
> ----
> Configure the DPI value
>
> Modifying the following value can help improve the way fonts looks in
> Firefox if the system's DPI is below 96. Firefox, by default, uses 96 and
> only uses the system's DPI if it is a higher value. To force the system's
> DPI regardless of its value, type about:config into the address bar and set
> layout.css.dpi to 0.
>
> Note that the above method only affects the Firefox user interface's DPI
> settings. Web page contents still use a DPI value of 96, which may look
> ugly or, in the case of high-resolution displays, may be rendered too small
> to read. A solution is to change layout.css.devPixelsPerPx to system's DPI
> divided by 96. For example, if your system's DPI is 144, then the value to
> add is 144/96 = 1.5. Changing layout.css.devPixelsPerPx to 1.5 makes web
> page contents use a DPI of 144, which looks much better.
> ----
>
> layout.css.devPixelsPerPx = 1.7 seems to give a "normal" size to the pages
>
> layout.css.dpi = 0
> ----
>
> For Thunderbird:
>
> ----
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/HiDPI#Thunderbird
>
> Same as in Firefox:
>
> ----
> layout.css.devPixelsPerPx = 1.7 seems to give a "normal" size to the pages
> layout.css.dpi = 0
> ----
>
> In Ardour there is a text zoom factor you can use to get things to be
> readable. But, for example, Ambdec and other utilities look small - but I
> got used to them.
>
> There is also an xrandr scaling option but I finally decided to not use
> it. The scaling is not that pretty and I like my very high resolution.
>
> Hope this helps...
>
> On the plus side - it is very, very quiet which was one of the main
>> reasons I opted for this one.
>>
>
> I really really like that! One of the things I hate in my w540 is the fan
> noise. Worse than the previous Thinkpads I had before. The touchpad was
> also atrocious. I finally replaced it with one that has three physical
> buttons. Still the buttons are on top of the touchpad but that is better
> than nothing. Will definitely look for a proper touchpad with physical
> buttons in the right place when I upgrade.
>
> One other thing, though, it onlyl has one usb port. Which may be a
>> limiting factor I have not considered carefully enough.
>>
>
> Ouch. Only one? Hopefully enough...
>
> -- Fernando
>
>


-- 
Oded Ben-Tal
obental.wixsite.com/main
http://soundcloud.com/odedbental
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/attachments/20170507/63fc1be8/attachment.html>


More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list