[PlanetCCRMA] Pd Extended problem (new package)

[ycollette.nospam at free.fr]

Hello,

I performed some first tests and it works a lot more better than the old version.
Magic glass is back. I was able to put an object from an extra package (freeverb~ - which was not working on the old version).

Just a little thng: I am wondering if a conf file for gem is missing.
At startup, in the bash console, I noticed these messages:

open: /etc/pd/gem.conf: No such file or directory
open: /home/admin/.config/pure-data/gem.conf: No such file or directory
open: ./gem.conf: No such file or directory
load plugins 'film' in '/usr/lib64/pd-extended/extra/Gem/'
pattern : /usr/lib64/pd-extended/extra/Gem/gem_film*.so

The /etc/pd/gem.conf seems to be missing. I not know what is this file for ... 
But I was not able to locate this file in the gem source directory.
Maybe this is normal. I will dig a little bit more.

Best regards,

YC

----- Mail original -----
De: "Fernando Lopez-Lezcano" <nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
À: "Yann Collette" <ycollette.nospam at free.fr>, "Fernando Lopez-Lezcano" <nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Envoyé: Mardi 11 Août 2015 02:03:23
Objet: Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Pd Extended problem (new package)

On 08/10/2015 02:29 PM, Yann Collette wrote:
> Nice, thanks a lot.
> The package is in the update repo or update-testing ?

It is in the Planet CCRMA repository for Fedora 22...
-- Fernando


> Le 10/08/2015 23:05, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit :
>> On 08/07/2015 11:13 PM, Yann Collette wrote:
>>> I looked in the debian/patches directory for the git repo of
>>> pd-extended.
>>> The file 05_user-install-paths.diff seems to deal with the 'extra' path
>>> a lot more than just replacing /usr/local/lib into /usr/lib64.
>>> I don't know yet what it does but I think it worth a try.
>>
>> I finally figured out the paths (I think) and my latest package seems
>> to start fine in a test fc22 install. A few example patches load
>> without problems or error messages. Of course the testing I do is
>> _very_ limited. I just pushed it out for fc22...
>>
>> Let me know how it goes, and thanks for the feedback and patience!
>>
>> If all goes well I will probably propagate to fc21 as well.
>> -- Fernando
>>
>>
>>> Le 08/08/2015 00:44, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit :
>>>> On 08/07/2015 01:01 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>>>> On 08/07/2015 12:58 PM, Yann Collette wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks again for all this work. And for the patches ... and
>>>>>> everything
>>>>>> else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for bringing up the problems in the first place!
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I figured out things, I need both the pd core from git and the
>>>>> extended stuff from svn which ALSO includes a pd directory with pd
>>>>> source (older? obsolete? confusing?). I'm trying to build a composite
>>>>> package by replacing the pd in the svn tree (0.43) with the pd in the
>>>>> git core (0.44). Hopefully that will work...
>>>>
>>>> It does in the sense it builds and tries to start.
>>>>
>>>> I have to find where the search paths are defined as that seems to be
>>>> wrong - the audio and midi test panel can't find basic objects that
>>>> should be there (all in red - first time this happens :-)
>>>>
>>>> -- Fernando
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Le 07/08/2015 21:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit :
>>>>>>> On 08/07/2015 12:11 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 08/07/2015 07:37 AM, ycollette.nospam at free.fr wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the source package of pure data and I searched for
>>>>>>>>> g_magicglass.* file in the directory pure-data-svn/pd/src/ (for
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> pd-extended package) and in pure-data-pd-extended/src/ (for the
>>>>>>>>> pd-extended source from git repo).
>>>>>>>>> The files g_magicglass.* (specific to pd-extended and not
>>>>>>>>> present in
>>>>>>>>> vanilla pd) are not in the source archive of the pd-extended
>>>>>>>>> fedora
>>>>>>>>> package.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, to me, in the fedora package, we have pd-vanilla + extra
>>>>>>>>> package
>>>>>>>>> from pd-extended.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What it looks to me to... sigh :-(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to again redo the package - looks like main core is in git and
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> extras in svn which is what I was downloading (and then I have to
>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>> both somehow).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I hit this before I think - the urls in the download pages
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>> point to valid things sometimes (for example the svn repository)
>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>> can't easily find which parts I really need to build a full source
>>>>>>> package. Argh! Anyone knows for sure?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma