[PlanetCCRMA] Performance degradation with kernel-rt-3.14.17-200.rt9.1.fc20.ccrma.x86_64
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Wed Sep 10 23:01:11 PDT 2014
On 09/09/2014 09:57 PM, Oleg Samarin wrote:
> I've made more testing
>
>>> echo "100" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct increases
>>> CPU does not speed up so much so it cann't be a workaround.
>>
>> How much faster does it go with min_perf_pct set to 100?
>
> Seems, it solves the issue:
>
> 3.4.17, min_perf_pct=100:
> Core [core-id] :Actual Freq (Mult.) C0% Halt(C1)% C3 % C6 %
> Core 1 [0]: 4420.54 (44.21x) 26.8 56 8.22 1
> Core 2 [1]: 4483.19 (44.83x) 49.9 8.1 25.2 1
> Core 3 [2]: 4509.71 (45.10x) 9.28 21.2 65.5 1
> Core 4 [3]: 4559.41 (45.59x) 57.7 1.32 19.1 2.19
Glad to hear that!
That is my experience as well...
>>What do you see in the other variables in
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate?
>
> There are only three variables:
>
> (3.4.17)
> max_perf_pct without=100
> min_perf_pct=33
> no_turbo=0
Another one to try is no_turbo - that would get you a more "even" speed
but you loose speed when running processes on few cpus. It performed
worse than no_turbo=0 in my limited tests.
-- Fernando
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list