[PlanetCCRMA] building Ardour3

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Tue May 29 14:11:01 PDT 2012

On 05/28/2012 08:36 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 03:36 AM, Michael E. Smith wrote:
>> Hello there,
>> In the interest of testing and bug reporting, I'm trying to build
>> ardour3 from source.
> Ha, funny, I just went through that 1 1/2 weeks ago...
>> Right now versions of lilv (>=0.14.0 required, 0.5.0 installed), and
>> indirectly lv2 (>=1.0.0 required, can't tell from yumex vis-a-vis
>> lv2core what's installed), are too old. In the meantime I'll probably
>> build those from source as well, but are there plans to update those in
>> the ccrma repositories or are we at the mercy of the greater fedora
>> community?
> I built those from the fc16 versions and save for a few small changes
> due to my build server, all went well. You can go to koji[*] and
> download the source packages for the builds you need. I think this is
> what I ended up building (in reverse order, on ancient fc14):
> ardour3-3.0-0.1.svn12363.fc14.ccrma
> lilv-0.14.2-0.2.fc14.ccrma
> sratom-0.2.0-0.3.fc14.ccrma
> sord-0.8.0-0.1.fc14.ccrma
> suil-0.6.0-0.2.fc14.ccrma
> serd-0.14.0-0.1.fc14.ccrma
> Ardour3 works fine in short tests...

More answers to an off-list email:

On 05/29/2012 12:47 AM, Michael E. Smith wrote:
> I'm on f16.
> And WRT your question about lv2, I don't have an lv2 package installed
> either. The closest thing I could find was lv2core. Its version is 6.0.0
> and the most recent lv2 is 1.0.0. It's just that lv2 shows up as old
> when I try to build lilv, hence the question.

So, I checked and lv2 and lv2-devel replace lv2core and lv2core-devel. I 
built them as well to be able to build the rest of the lilv stack for 
ardour3. They all installed and seemed to work fine.

-- Fernando

More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list