[PlanetCCRMA] Getting rid of or disabling Pulse a good idea?

Gary Murray garymurray at ireland.com
Thu May 21 14:09:29 PDT 2009

Would totally agree with removing pulse audio. 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Mazarick" <mazarick at bellsouth.net>
To: planetccrma at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Sent: Thursday, 21 May, 2009 9:33:59 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] Getting rid of or disabling Pulse a good idea?

I've noticed that many/most other people go thru the same basic learning
curve I did.  They eliminate Pulse Audio almost as a matter of course for
any serious audio work with Linux.   I can see a lot of benefits to Pulse
for the average user, but it seems to cause nothing but confusion and
headaches for the serious user.   I would imagine it is mainly because Pulse
audio wants to make the latency as long as possible in order to maintain
quality, and the composer/musician would prefer latency to be as short as
possible and still maintain an acceptable level of sound quality.

I would recommend either disabling or removing Pulse Audio from the standard
distribution for CCRMA and enabling/installing it for the cases where it is

Any other thoughts/suggestions/opinions?

Mike Mazarick

PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu

More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list