[PlanetCCRMA] package updates
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale
Arnaud.Gomes at ircam.fr
Fri Oct 3 12:34:34 PDT 2008
"Paul Coccoli" <pcoccoli at gmail.com> writes:
> I'd like to say I prefer stable, but who am I kidding? We're running
> Fedora. There's no such thing as stable. I think that's why there's
> interest in the CentOS PlanetCCRMA. IMHO, that's what the users who
> need stability should use (although I haven't tried it yet, so I don't
> actually know how stable it is).
Actually I don't know either. :-)
I have been more or less following updates to the Fedora Planet CCRMA
and leaving packages from Fedora as they are, with a few exceptions. I
have also been trying to keep up with fast-moving software like
patchage or rakarrack, but this kind of programs often need
bleeding-edge libraries (GTK comes to mind) so I have not had much
luck here.
So I'd say the CentOS Planet CCRMA is rather stable, but there is no
formal policy here and I'm not sure I would want one. I keep thinking
about the issues people seem to have with recent versions of jack and
I will probably upgrade to jackmp as soon as Fernando releases stable
packages for Fedora.
--
Arnaud
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list