[PlanetCCRMA] New conflict with f9 update

[Ken Dawson]

Wow! really fast!  Thanks.

/ken

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:52 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:32 -0800, Ken Dawson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Fedora 9 just posted an update to sbcl.i386, and slime-sbcl doesn't seem
>>> to like it.
>>>
>>> /ken
>>>
>>> # yum update
>>> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
>>> Setting up Update Process
>>> Resolving Dependencies
>>> --> Running transaction check
>>> ---> Package sbcl.i386 0:1.0.22-1.fc9 set to be updated
>>> --> Processing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 for package: slime-sbcl
>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
>>>   --> Missing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 (installed)
>>> Error: Missing Dependency: sbcl = 1.0.17 is needed by package
>>> slime-sbcl-2.0-12.fc9.ccrma.i386 (installed)
>> Yes, I'm working on it, thanks for the report!
> 
> Should be fixed now (new build of slime + clm + cm + cmn on i386)
> -- Fernando
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>