[PlanetCCRMA] FC8, experience so far + pulse audio ...
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Wed May 7 02:32:13 PDT 2008
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 19:28 +1000, Nicholas Manojlovic wrote:
> A point;
>
> Stanford is the world renowned and recognised resource on computer
> music, so why is Fedora doing the packaging?
The packaging of what? Generic audio packages? Pulse Audio?
Short answer:
resources
(or rather, scarcity of resources)
Packaging is a very very time consuming job, the more help CCRMA can get
from Fedora the better. Ideally the community would eventually take over
most of the packages.
-- Fernando
> I really liked the first paragraph of the first post, summed things up
> perfectly.
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
> <nando at ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 09:19 -0400, Mike Mazarick wrote:
> > I had issues with getting sound to come out from either the
> newly
> > minted linux drivers or from the Via onboard chipset
> (although the Via
> > soundcard seemed to work better, it had more latency). One
> of the
> > big issues was trying to figure out from the Jack messages,
> the
> > dmesgs, or the scsconfig.log or scsrun.log what the issues
> were.
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list