[PlanetCCRMA] FC8, experience so far + pulse audio ...

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Wed May 7 02:32:13 PDT 2008

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 19:28 +1000, Nicholas Manojlovic wrote:
> A point;
> Stanford is the world renowned and recognised resource on computer
> music, so why is Fedora doing the packaging?

The packaging of what? Generic audio packages? Pulse Audio? 
Short answer:


(or rather, scarcity of resources)

Packaging is a very very time consuming job, the more help CCRMA can get
from Fedora the better. Ideally the community would eventually take over
most of the packages. 

-- Fernando

> I really liked the first paragraph of the first post, summed things up
> perfectly. 
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
> <nando at ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
>         On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 09:19 -0400, Mike Mazarick wrote:
>         > I had issues with getting sound to come out from either the
>         newly
>         > minted linux drivers or from the Via onboard chipset
>         (although the Via
>         > soundcard seemed to work better, it had more latency).   One
>         of the
>         > big issues was trying to figure out from the Jack messages,
>         the
>         > dmesgs, or the scsconfig.log or scsrun.log what the issues
>         were.

More information about the PlanetCCRMA mailing list