[PlanetCCRMA] Were's the weak link?
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Sat Jan 20 18:46:00 PST 2007
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:41 -0500, linuxmedia4 at netscape.net wrote:
> (I didn't know if I should start a new thread)
>
> It was suggested that "rtirq script was 'not doing the right thing' on
> later kernels". Would this, by any chance, be the situation for
> 2.6.16-1.2080.16.rrt.rhfc5.ccrma?
Nope, that one is "old" :-)
-- Fernando
More information about the PlanetCCRMA
mailing list