[PlanetCCRMA] PlanetCCRMA *not* in the press

[Nicholas Manojlovic]

When F7 came out, they annoced respins.org - a place to share your own spins
of Fedora.

Fernando, where does the distro stand in terms of using
trade-marks/copyright material from stanford? In theory, is it legal to
distribute our own ccrma on such a website as a stand-alone?



On 8/8/07, Edward Lilley <ejlilley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jeff Sandys wrote:
> > My two cents: European magazine, European distributions.
> >
> > When I started the choice was PlanetCCRMA or Agnula.
> > Now Agnula is dead, long live PlanetCCRMA.
> >
> > I installed UbuntuStudio on my wife's computer after the
> > experience I had building an Ubuntu computer for my inlaws.
> > Now my wife can help her parents with their computer, and
> > she might do some scoring for her string quartet.
> >
> > And I like the Pure:Dyne live CD (Dynabolic).  One of their
> > packages is Fluxus, a mashup of PLT Scheme with OpenGL,
> > ODE free body dynamics and OSC sound.  I need to recompile
> > PLT Scheme with some different options to get Fluxus to work
> > in Fedora/PlanetCCRMA.  I have Pure:Dyne docked/nested
> > on my laptop.
> >
> > I think the improvements in the Fedora build process will help
> > make PlanetCCRMA a stronger contender in the future, with
> > the ability to make a live CD/DVD and directly install with ease.
> >
> > -- Jeff Sandys
> >
> >
> > Stephan Neuhaus-2 wrote:
> >
> >> ...
> >> Spiegel Online, one of Germany's most-read online magazines,
> >> ...
> >> "Linux users have the choice between at least five current
> >> distributions geared specially processing audio:
> >> 64 Studio, Dynabolic, Jacklab, Musix, and Ubuntu Studio."
> >> ...
> >> There is no mention of PlanetCCRMA in the article.
> >> ...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> I think a live-CD would be a really good idea for PlanetCCRMA (or even
> just a stand-alone distro). Perhaps the magazine's criteria for
> "distribution" meant stand-alone. However, even though planetCCRMA
> arguably is no less a distro in its own right than UbuntuStudio (which,
> seeing as it uses _only_ Ubuntu packages is probably less of a distro
> than planetCCRMA), I think a stand-alone liveCD/installation DVD would
> be a great way forwards (or sideways).
>
> Also, replying to the comment about "academic" music packages, I assume
> by academic you mean slightly older midi sequencers with more
> sophisticated programming tools, not WYSIWYG classical music notation
> applications (which is what I prefer) :-)        .
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA at ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/attachments/20070807/4d9e5680/attachment.html>