[PlanetCCRMA] Fedor Extras packages

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Tue Sep 12 11:28:00 2006

On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 13:44 -0400, blindman jones wrote:
> I have been using them... no ill effects so far.
> I have not used the JACK that showed up a while back yet though...
> will have to try it and see if anything starts to smoke.

It will not, I hope. 

There's one small caveat with Jack. My packages in Planet CCRMA have a
different default realtime priority that is optimized to mesh with the
interrupt priority ordering that the rtirq script does at startup (the
default Jack realtime priority is too low). I don't think it will have a
big effect but I have not really tested it. 

-- Fernando

> On 9/12/06, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 17:28 +0100, Andrew Longland-Meech wrote:
> > > Hi Fernando and all,
> > >
> > > Should we now be using the Fedora Extras versions of the CCRMA packages
> > > that appear in the list of upgradeables when doing a 'yum check-update'
> > > or is it best to stay with the versions that come directly from
> > > PlanetCCRMA?
> >
> > Packages from Extras should be fine (but let me know otherwise). There
> > is a slow migration of packages from Planet CCRMA to Extras going on.