[PlanetCCRMA] Best performance?

Mark Knecht Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Tue Nov 16 09:37:01 2004


On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:07:41 +0000, Steve Harris
<s.w.harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 07:53:50AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> 
> 
> > > > a) All pass delay line, linear interpolation
> > > > b) Auto phaser
> > > > c) DJ EQ (mono)
> > > > d) Multivoice Chorus
> > >
> > > this one is a bad choice, its cpu load depends on settings.
> > >
> > > > e) SC1
> > >
> > > - Steve
> > >
> >
> > OK, although if people just use default settings would it at least be
> > consistent. However possibly a limiter on each track instead of a
> > compressor might be a better choice? I use limiters and gates more on
> > individual tracks myself, but I wanted one plug that was more CPU
> > intensive.
> 
> I was talking about d) the chorus, the compressor is fine. Er, well
> actually it used more CPU when you feed it silence, but thats a bug, and I
> have a patch for it...
> 
> 
Oh, OK. The way the colors read on my gmail account  it looked like
you were saying SC1. No problem.

Again, I'm open to whatever set of plugins people think makes sense.
With this set of plugins it looks like I'm far less CPU bound and more
disk bound on my system so maybe these 5 don't push things hard
enough? (Or I just have some CPU headroom...)