[PlanetCCRMA] jackd xruns problem: solved?

Mark Knecht mknecht@controlnet.com
Fri Aug 13 15:36:01 2004

Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>>sounds cool. Is there a path to this core (now or in the future) for a 
>>RH9 based machine, or do I need to rebuild it with FC1/2 first?
> Seems unlikely to me. 2.6 needs a bunch of updated userland packages. It
> would be possible but I don't know if it is worth the work. I have not
> tried booting RH9 into 2.6 for a while so I don't know exactly what
> would happen[*]. FC2 would be the only target for now. 

Cool. Reasonable response even in light of Kjetil's experience. I'm not 
up for blazzing a trail here. Just looking for more performance. 
Probably best for me to consider updating from RH9 to FC2 one of these 
days if I want to do this.