[PlanetCCRMA] which rpm?

Mark Knecht mknecht@controlnet.com
Tue Feb 25 09:36:02 2003

   Hi. Ardour works very well on the current Planet kernel. I cannot say how
well it will work on yours. ;-)

   Latency is heavily influenced by your sound card choice and your specific
system configuration. I normally run at about 5mS on my machine, but have
run as low as 2mS with no xruns.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> [mailto:planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU]On Behalf Of Lawrence
> Miranda
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:27 AM
> To: planetccrma@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] which rpm?
> I've rebuild the planet kernel sources for more current gcc and athlon
> support. Which rpm should I install (386 or 686)? I have both
> produced both,
> as described somewhere in the mailing list archive on
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/planetccrma/2002-November
> /000400.ht
> ml and the part where you
>   rpmbuild -ba kernel-2.4.19-1.ll.spec
>   rpmbuild -ba --target i686 kernel-2.4.19-1.ll.spec
> All of them? Will it be like
>   rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/kernel*.rpm and then
>   rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686/kernel*.rpm ?
> Also, my current sytem on redhat 8 has nvidia modules already installed.
> Will they still work after I install the kernel? Anybody has benchmarks on
> this kernel regarding low latency? Will Ardour realy work? If it
> works, will
> it be better in terms of latency than Windows-based apps like
> Cakewalk Sonar
> or Cubase SX?
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma