[PlanetCCRMA] 8 or 9, any recommendations?

[Mark Knecht]

Probably  RH 9. Newer kernel, so better support for 1394 and most things.

I liked KDE more in RH 8 though. 9's a bit strange that way.

Cheers,
Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> [mailto:planetccrma-admin@ccrma.Stanford.EDU]On Behalf Of not8ohm
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:41 AM
> To: planetccrma@ccrma.Stanford.EDU
> Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] 8 or 9, any recommendations?
>
>
> hi,
>
> Just wondering if anybody had any opinions regarding the stability of
> the various redhat distro's regarding stability, resource consumption etc.
>
>
> cheers
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> PlanetCCRMA mailing list
> PlanetCCRMA@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma
>
>