<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="font-family: 'Segoe UI',Frutiger,'Frutiger Linotype','Dejavu Sans','Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<div class="hiri-body-wrapper">
<div>A general question: is there a reason that constant tables, like exponent_table, slashify_table, char_ok_in_a_name, etc... are declared as static pointers, and then calloc'd? I'm trying to unit test some code that hooks s7, and my testing apparattus is
reporting a bunch of leaks. So i've been looking at a generalized "free" for s7, and came across this.<br>
<br>
Would it be better to declare them as static arrays? that way the calloc calls could be avoided and memory leak tools would be happier. I'd be happy to submit a patch if you guys (especially bil) think this is a good idea.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Woody Douglass<br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>